In its May Financial Stability Report the Reserve Bank of New Zealand reveals the results stress tests designed to assess the vulnerability of households to service their mortgages if rates rise.
General
Why KiwiSaver balances go up… and down
Quick question: what’s the difference between a savings account and a KiwiSaver account?
Short answer: when you put money in, the first always goes up, but the other goes up and down. That’s no small thing.
And while we personal finance folks like to go on about the magic of compounding for both saving and investment, sometimes we’d be better off pointing out how different the two are.
The one caveat to saying that a savings account always goes up is inflation. Savings can actually roll backwards as well, when you bring inflation into the picture. You’re adding money, but its real value and how much it can buy gradually becomes less and less. This is why we need investing.
Which brings us back to KiwiSaver, which is not a savings account as many people think of it, but rather an investment account. And investing is aimed at buying assets that become more valuable over time, despite inflation. It’s the remedy for inflation.
But what could make a KiwiSaver account balance lose ground?
Why your KiwiSaver account can go down
Okay, so I won’t bore everyone with too technical a discussion on unitisation, but the key thing to know is that when you put money into KiwiSaver, you’re buying units.
Units are a way of keeping track of what we own in KiwiSaver.
These units are linked to the assets our fund has invested in, such as shares, commercial property or bonds. Think of the investments like a big fat orange – and our units as a segment of that. When the orange rises or falls in value, so does the value of our segment.
Unlike a savings account, where we’re setting money aside, in KiwiSaver we are buying things that have value. That orange can be priced higher on the market at some times, lower in others. It’s a very normal state of affairs.
When we look at a savings account balance, we rightly think about how much we have. Not so with our KiwiSaver balance. When we look at that, what we’re really seeing is how much our fund’s investments and our corresponding units are worth – what their value is right now. Again, no small thing.
So perhaps instead of asking ourselves how much we have in KiwiSaver, we should be asking, “How much is my KiwiSaver worth at the moment?” Might be higher, might be lower.
Of course, the idea is for our units to increase in value over time. Either because someone else will pay more for them on the market or because they earn income like rent or dividends, the overall trend should be up. That’s why we do this! Without the aim of a return, there would be no point.
But there is such a thing as a negative return.
Why your KiwiSaver account will go down
Since the GFC in 2008, we’ve had good times of growth in KiwiSaver. Long may that continue!
But this also means that most of us have only seen things move in one direction, with KiwiSaver balances almost never heading down. Things did dip a bit last August, but because most of us contribute small amounts regularly to our KiwiSaver, we probably only saw things flatten out a bit. Our balances would not have gone down at all.
At some stage they will. If you remember the GFC or are a veteran of the dot com bubble, you’ll remember how quickly markets can turn, and how assets can suddenly be worth less. When something like that happens again, we will see our KiwiSaver balances tumble.
Again, this is because our balances do not measure the money we have, but what our units are worth.
And because people feel losses so much more acutely than gains, typically there will be thousands of people calling up their KiwiSaver providers trying to understand how on earth they have lost money when they have been putting in cash all this time! We’ll need to be ready.
Much of this is about the right mindset to have when there is a downturn. Ideally, we’ll say something like:
• “Yep, saw that one coming.”
• “Bound to occur from time to time.”
• “Must be that point in the cycle.”
• “I wonder what it’ll be worth in 10 years?”
The worst action would to be to act rashly and run for cover. “Sell! Sell!” is the classic scene of a moneybags barking into a phone to his broker. If we suddenly sell our units and buy others that seem far safer in another fund, we effectively lock in our losses and miss out when values rebound. We lose money permanently.
It’s all about perspective. Because we are typically drip-feeding into our funds, when unit prices plunge, they actually become a bargain. Someone might say, for instance, “I’m putting even more money in now because I know I’ll reap rewards in the future.” When oranges are on sale, it can be a good time to buy.
Now if any of this talk about balances moving up and down makes you anxious, you should contact us to make sure you’re in the fund that suits you best. After all, you should be relaxed about your KiwiSaver and not losing sleep.
So what’s the difference between a savings account and a KiwiSaver account? One only goes up. The other goes up and down, but should always be worth much more in the long run.
KiwiSaver hits $40b, but balances stay low
Strong investment growth has boosted the value of KiwiSaver to over $40 billion but individual balances remain low for many despite the scheme running for nearly 10 years.
Figures from Australian research firm Strategic Insight show total KiwiSaver funds hit $40.651 billion at the end of March, up from $38.416b as of December 31.
Daniel Morris, senior manager data and systems support at Strategic Insight, said KiwiSaver had seen 5.8 per cent growth over the quarter, bouncing back after a period of lower growth in the December quarter.
“It was probably a bit larger than expected,” he said
But while the total amount looks impressive, individual saving are still relatively small.
Based on Inland Revenue figures 2,727,675 people were signed up to KiwiSaver in March, putting the average balance at $14,903.
David Boyle, group manager education at the Commission for Financial Capability, said that on the surface KiwiSaver looked as if it were going well.
“But scratch the surface and there are some significant concerns and issues that need to be addressed to really get KiwiSaver delivering to its true potential.”
Boyle said the average balance was affected by the number of under 18-year-olds in the scheme who did not have much in their accounts.
“Most were signed up when the $1k kickstart was available and talking to a number of providers very few of these members are making any regular contributions until they reach the age of 18. So this affects the average balance.”
About 360,000 members are under 18.
Boyle said about 580,000 people, another group, were not getting the full government subsidy which meant they were contributing nothing or less than $1043 a year.
He said KiwiSaver providers needed to do more.
“Providers need to keep working on getting their members connected to their KiwiSaver account, especially those that have not made contributions but are eligible for the member tax credit.”
Claire Matthews, a KiwiSaver expert at Massey University, said it was hard to judge whether the $40b figure was a reason for celebration because people might have saved that money regardless of KiwiSaver.
“We don’t know what people would have saved without that.”
Matthews said an average balance of less than $15k did not sound a lot but it depended on the age of the person.
“For someone aged 60 – if that is all they have saved it’s not great,” she said.
But for someone in their 20s it was a good start which would now benefit from compound interest.
Matthews said the Government needed to increase the minimum contribution rate to help boost balances.
She believed individuals should contribute 10 per cent of what they earned. The current minimum is 3 per cent.
Richard Klipin, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, said the average balance of between $14,000 and $15,000 was a start.
“Like most developing countries we have got to start somewhere.”
But he said it was not enough and it opened up the need for greater advice around how much was enough to live off in retirement.
Susan St John, co-director of Auckland University’s Retirement Policy and Research Centre, said although average balances were growing, those at the low end would likely not have much at retirement.
“Not only have withdrawals for housing accelerated, but many struggling families are having to access funds under hardship claims.
“Many of those under the median will have very small amounts, if any on retirement.”
On top of that issue she said male median balances would outpace female balances.
Are You Maximising Your KiwiSaver? – Make sure you do by 30th June 2017!
I wanted to make you aware of Member Tax Credits for KiwiSaver that you are able to claim.
There were just under 580,000 eligible KiwiSaver members who received no contribution from the Government in their accounts in the 2016 financial year. That’s up from 573,000 the year before, 517,000 a year earlier and 466,000 in the 2012/2013 year. – Why let the Government keep money that is entitled to you!!
The Government contribution to your KiwiSaver savings is worth up to a maximum of $521.43 – but to get the full amount, you need to have contributed at least $1042.86 by 30 June 2017.
The Government pays 50 cents for every $1 you contribute, the maximum will be $521.43, so therefore you need to contribute $1042.86 to maximise the tax credit
If you are 18 or over, working, self-employed or not working, you can get these tax credits as long as you contribute $1,042.86 for the year.
You can check your KiwiSaver contributions online with most providers and see if you have contributed at least $1,042.86.
You DO NOT have to contribute if you do not wish to or you can contribute what is affordable in order to get at least some of the $521. (So for example if you contributed $500 you would receive $250 tax credit).
We can show you ways to make this easier over the course of the year and plan it so that you are maximising the benefits of KiwiSaver.
If you have any questions, then please feel free to contact me on 09 551 3500 or email info@insurenz.co.nz.
Source
RBNZ forecasts low rates to stay, sees weaker inflation ahead
Reserve Bank delivers cash rate call
Auckland no longer the most unaffordable region
Mortgage rate rises expected to continue
New Zealanders unaware of rate rise impacts: survey
Call for NZ to rethink bowel screening
New Zealand needs to rethink its exorbitantly expensive second-rate bowel screening programme based on research from the UK.
That’s the view of Associate Professor Brian Cox from the University of Otago who says UK research proves flexible sigmoidoscopy screening is better than the faecal occult blood (FOBT) New Zealand is planning to use.
During a sigmoidoscopy exam, a thin, flexible tube, or sigmoidoscope, is inserted into the rectum, while a FOBT detects very small amounts of blood in a bowel motion before they become visible to the naked eye.
The results of a UK trial of flexible sigmoidoscopy published in The Lancet confirmed the reduced bowel cancer incidence and mortality persists for at least 17 years after the flexible sigmoidoscopy test. The benefit is very likely to persist for the rest of a person’s life, Professor Cox says.
He says a 15-minute sigmoidoscopy is by far the most cost-effective strategy for reducing bowel cancer in New Zealand and it could be performed by GPs.
“This is the most cancer-preventing 15 minutes anyone could ever undertake.”
A flexible sigmoidoscopy screening test once when aged 55-64 years reduces lifelong risk of bowel cancer by 35 per cent and mortality from bowel cancer by 41 per cent.
Professor Cox says the earlier results of the UK trial at 11 years of follow-up were published in 2010 but were not deemed sufficient by the Ministry of Health to guide the development of bowel screening policy in New Zealand and only a pilot study of two-yearly FOBT screening was pursued.
The evidence from the UK trial clearly indicates the need to completely rethink the approach to bowel screening in New Zealand before an exorbitantly expensive second-rate FOBT programme is instituted, he says.
A national flexible sigmoidoscopy programme could begin within 12 months covering the entire country.
About 3,000 New Zealanders are diagnosed with bowel cancer each year, and it’s the second most common cause of cancer death.
Budget 2016 invests $39.3 million for national bowel screening, starting with Hutt Valley and Wairarapa DHBs in 2017.










